ChatterBank17 mins ago
Why Is The This Verminous Waste Of Space Allowed To Eat Better Than Many Elderly, On Benefits At Our Expense?
http://
Surely his diet should be rancid water, mouldy bread and watery gruel?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Quangoid. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Aah wishlist i see.
"He now claims to be a 'changed man' and has passed a number of Violence Reduction courses in jail - and is in talks with solicitors about appealing his life sentence."
Is there anyway the public can do anything about this as he's clearly a dangerous fellow and if he tried moving to my mews there would definitely be action in the form of a petition to see him out of there pronto!
Does anyone know whether he'd be given a new identity or whether his new neighbors would be given a warning that he was moving near by as it happens with sex offenders?
"He now claims to be a 'changed man' and has passed a number of Violence Reduction courses in jail - and is in talks with solicitors about appealing his life sentence."
Is there anyway the public can do anything about this as he's clearly a dangerous fellow and if he tried moving to my mews there would definitely be action in the form of a petition to see him out of there pronto!
Does anyone know whether he'd be given a new identity or whether his new neighbors would be given a warning that he was moving near by as it happens with sex offenders?
///Britain's most violent prisoner has revealed the gut-busting menu he wants to enjoy if he is released from jail.
Having spent some 41 years behind bars Charles Bronson, now known as Charles Salvador, has drawn up his food wishlist///
Tbh, I can't see what was so hard to understand, it was right at the top of the Link.
Quangoid - // Why is this waste of oxygens wishlist in a national paper? Surely the the reporter should be sacked for this alarming non story. //
Because your newspaper of choice does this kind of thing to create exactly the reaction you have given us - to get all het up about something which is not actually happening.
Now that you know his `list`is not real, you are turning your ire on the journalist who has simply provided you with a few degrees of higher blood pressure, in common with your fellow readers.
Before you turn your attention to the prospect of the prisoner being freed, and getting all het up again about that - remember that he is `considering an appeal' - that means he is thinking about it, not that it is happening tomorrow, and he will be occupying the flat next door to you by the weekend.
You really need to a) calm down and b) read what is in front of you, not what makes you leap to the biggest anger-provoking conclusion.
Because your newspaper of choice does this kind of thing to create exactly the reaction you have given us - to get all het up about something which is not actually happening.
Now that you know his `list`is not real, you are turning your ire on the journalist who has simply provided you with a few degrees of higher blood pressure, in common with your fellow readers.
Before you turn your attention to the prospect of the prisoner being freed, and getting all het up again about that - remember that he is `considering an appeal' - that means he is thinking about it, not that it is happening tomorrow, and he will be occupying the flat next door to you by the weekend.
You really need to a) calm down and b) read what is in front of you, not what makes you leap to the biggest anger-provoking conclusion.
I wish you would explain why you consider him to be a "verminous waste of space".
Then we might be better able to answer why he is "allowed to eat".
If "the system" insists on incarcerating an individual for over forty years, the least it can do is provide that individual with a reasonable choice of diet. Regardless of what he has done, he is a human being.
What do you want, that he should be thrown in a pit, and left to starve to death?
Then we might be better able to answer why he is "allowed to eat".
If "the system" insists on incarcerating an individual for over forty years, the least it can do is provide that individual with a reasonable choice of diet. Regardless of what he has done, he is a human being.
What do you want, that he should be thrown in a pit, and left to starve to death?
Latest Posts
ChatterBank62 mins ago
Animals & Nature78 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles78 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles133 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.