Donate SIGN UP

Another Belter From The Judiciary!

Avatar Image
ToraToraTora | 21:22 Tue 19th Apr 2016 | Society & Culture
50 Answers
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-36082621
Why can we not staff our system with people who are not so gullible?
Gravatar

Answers

41 to 50 of 50rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3

Avatar Image
Eddie, these seem to be facts from the article. I think if I had been a juror there would only be one conclusion: Ellie's mother Jennie Gray, [ ]has admitted perverting the course of justice by giving a false account of what she did on the day Ellie died. Jurors were told Mr Butler caused "catastrophic" head injuries to Ellie at their home in Westover Close,...
21:44 Tue 19th Apr 2016
or Maria Coldwell .... yeah yeah I know 3T's hangers on are gonna pile in with one liners " Mary who what-well, who dat den ? "

Good luck Mikey - all cases are fused into one. Judges and juries referred to as "staff" so they can be slagged off ad lib as a corporate body (hem,hem).
,
yes it is another belter from 3 teeeeeee and pals !


PP...with the greatest of respect, sometimes I just can't make head nor toe of what you say.

This man was clearly dangerous, was let out of prison and then went on to murder his child. And yes, I know he hasn't been convicted yet.
Question Author
PPs posts are high on the list of things mankind must strive to comprehend one day. Perhaps we will reach that level of enlightenment but for now mikey, join the rest of us in bewilderment.
TTT...I am sure he has a point to make but his obtuse syntax makes for very difficult reading !
here's a local news report from the time of the overturning of his 2007 conviction. whilst there's not too much detail, the reasons for the appeal being allowed are set out.

http://www.suttonguardian.co.uk/news/8237305.Dad_cleared_of_injuring_baby_by_Court_of_Appeal/
Question Author
so they managed to con the judges, we know that.
^^ Thanks very good link
I think that the contention that the Court of Appeal were 'gullible' can be discounted.
'' The court of appeal concluded that there was no rational basis on which a jury on the basis of the medical evidence given, could reject an unknown reason for injuries other than shaking''
''It also found the Judges summing up contained serious misdirection''
So the fault lies with the inadequate medical evidence and a poor summing up by the original Judge, rather than a 'Gullible' Court of appeal.
Question Author
Ok even if we understand the reasons why, it turned out that they where wrong and the girl died on a technicality
Poor child, another wasted life. I'm with you TTT 100%.
Do you remember the 'Free George Davis/George Davis is innocent' campaign from the 1970's?

He was a known bank robber who was convicted, had his conviction quashed (because he didn't do it) and then went on to commit more bank robberies.

The judiciary have to deal with matters on a case-by-case basis and hindsight is always 20/20.

41 to 50 of 50rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3

Do you know the answer?

Another Belter From The Judiciary!

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.