PC Protection

Further to Ron's previous Q. Just out of interest, what benefits are there in using the paid-for Kaspersky over the free MS Security Essentials? I'm guessing there must be some.......
12:53 Sat 28th Apr 2012
 
Best Answer


No best answer has yet been selected by sidkid. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

1 to 6 of 6

Internet Security suites (like Kaspersky) generally cover a wider range of things than "free" anti virus products.

MSE mainly does just anti-virus and malware, other free AV product JUST do anti virus.

Security suites do other things like check your email for viruses, highlight dodgy software web sites and so on, none of which MSE does.
VHG...I didn't think it was necessary for e/mails to be scanned; only their attachments which could contain a virus.

Consequently, as I have MSE which costs me nothing, I am happy that it will do as good a job as most paid for Virus Protection programmes.

Nevertheless, irrespective of whatever VP programme I had in my computer, I would immediately delete any unsolicited e/mail which has an attatchment and then do a run through with free edition of Malwarebytes.

Hopefully, I am adequately protected.

Ron.
P.S......I am Not the Ron to whom sidkid was referring.:-

http://www.theanswerb.../Question1128835.html

Ron (The other one.)
>>>VHG...I didn't think it was necessary for e/mails to be scanned; only their attachments which could contain a virus.

emails can be sent (and received) in two formats - plain text and HTML.

Plain text is just what it says, simple text with no fancy fonts or graphic images.

HTML email on the other hand can contain fancy colours, fonts, images, links and so on.

HTML email is the sort you may get from a company like Amazon or Tesco or other companies when you sign up for their newsletter.

But viruses and other nasties can be "hidden" inside this HTML and the HTML may run a javascript program or have dodgy "links" hidden in the HTML.

Most spam email is sent in HTML format.

So emails dont have to have an attachment to be dangerous.
Here is an article from 2007 to show how dangerous HTML mail can be

http://voices.washing...ml_based_email_1.html
VHG....I am not really technically minded. Nevertheless, I would suggest with respect that, as technology keeps advancing on a daily basis, things will have improved with all VP programmes since the publication of the 2007 dated article to which you have drawn attention. MSE was not released until 2009 and may well have taken into account such a position as described in the 2007 article and then 'in-built' suitable protection.

Truth is, I don't really know.

Ron.

1 to 6 of 6

Related Questions

i bought the mcafee protection plus 2007 from pc world yesterday, on their recommendation, installed it and it tells me that i'm not protected against viruses even though it says on box protected...
Af'noon all, I use the internet quite a bit and need some advice on what protection I should have on my pc. So far I have the free versions of Zone alarm firewall, Avira antivirus and Malwarebytes...
Hi peeps! Back again on AB after a nice holiday away from Weston Super Mare.I've been on my computer for a couple of days trying to sort out Mozilla Firefox and have uninstalled it because every time...
I've got the FREE versions of Zone Alarm and AVG Are these adequate protection ? AVG states I have got the following - Anti Virus Anti Spyware Email scanner License Link Scanner Resident Shield Update...
I've just removed PC Norton after it was about to expire from my pc and installed some free software from my Virgin Broadband. It comes up with "Make sure 4 security essentials are ticked. Well I got...
Morning all, I am getting very confused as to what protection I should have on my pc. I know I must have virus software and firewall but what about things like spam blockers, spyware, registry clean...

Latest posts