Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 20 of 35rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Not if there is still doubt.
No
No.

Still obsessed with this case I see.
No.

We don't have a statute of limitations on murder in this country. Only a few weeks ago Christopher Hampton was convicted of Melanie Road's murder. I think it's great that such cases are not closed, and with advances in detection techniques, the chances of closing the loops grow every year.
Pl0d/CPS know the guilty but they cannot prove it, any new info that comes out should be utilized as far as possible. The purps have lived their scumbag lives whilst the victim had his snuffed out. If we can put these low lives away despite the activities of their parasitical lawyers then I don't care how long it takes. I often concur with your views AOG but your view on this is bang out of order.
AOG

I don't think there is any doubt that you think it should be closed .

So seriously , tell us why you hold that view
Question Author
Perhaps I worded my headline wrongly.

I agree no murder enquiry should be closed along with child abuser cases, but I fail to see why certain one's are given priority over others, after all there are already two serving life sentences for this murder.

Question Author
sp1814

Christopher Hampton??????

Ask many who he is, or even who was his unfortunate victim Melanie Road.

Get my drift?
Strange case.

The police were reluctant to investigate and prosecute this case properly for years.

And now they can't leave it alone.
It is right that *all* those responsible are punished.....not just a couple of 'token' culprits.

Many of us are perfectly aware of who Melanie Road is/was.

Please stop with your interminable implications that this would have been put to bed years ago has SL been white.
Any murder case where there are perpetrators ( known or unknown ) at
large , should not be closed , but left on the back burner , for the simple treason that evidence ,might come to light in the future , which can help to convict the perpetrators
AOG

I've just checked and the story was reported in:

The Daily Mail
The BBC
The Mirror
The Telegraph
The Guardian
The Sun
The Mirror

The point I am making is that where someone is walking free after committing such a serious crime, there should be no point at which they should feel they can relax.

They should always be in fear of a knock at the door.
AOG

But what are your thoughts?

Should this case be closed, even if there is evidence that others were involved?

Are the convictions handed down 'good enough'?
Question Author
sp1814

/// Should this case be closed, even if there is evidence that others were involved? ///

No

/// Are the convictions handed down 'good enough'? ///

Not really but at least it is a start, much more than can be said for the vast number of now forgotten murder cases, where no one has yet been convicted.

Now please answer my question, how many murder victim's mothers are now Baronesses?
aog - are you going to answer my question @14:41hrs ?
AOG

Okay...so we are agree. This case should not be closed.

You then went on to write:

Now please answer my question, how many murder victim's mothers are now Baronesses?

Was this a question you asked in your head?

Because you didn't ask it on this thread.
How many murder victims mothers campaigned tirelessly?
Question Author
Bazile

Am I obliged to?
I think most mothers would prefer their child to still be living rather than to have been awarded the title of Baroness.....
Question Author
sp1814

Just adding a little spice to an already over cooked meal.

Still care to give me an answer?

1 to 20 of 35rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Is It Time That This Case Was Now Closed?

Answer Question >>