|
Of course it could be wrong, or more likely incomplete or not universally applicable. The basis of science is that someone observes something, comes up with a hypothesis to explain it and uses the hypothesis to make predictions that the scientific community then test. If every single test is passed, the scientific community may upgrade the hypothesis to a theory. That's where the Theory of Relativity is at the moment. No testable situation has been found where it doesn't predicict what is observed. However, no scientist worthy of the name would discount the possibility of such a situation existing.
All of this is the antithesis of the religious view, where the explanations are 'known' and the observations have to be manipulated to fit them.
|