To subscribe to this question you need to
sign in to the AnswerBank or register
if you are not already a member. All you need is a valid email address to register.
1 to 17 of 17
BillySugger Thurs 13/11/08 21:54
Duck knows
jen78 Thurs 13/11/08 21:55
5?
hippyhoppy Thurs 13/11/08 21:56
3
Schutzengel Thurs 13/11/08 22:00
Question Author
Nice try Jen,
The answer is 3.
It had me mystified for ages.
Schutzengel Thurs 13/11/08 22:10
Question Author
hippyhoppy - Spot on.
dove Thurs 13/11/08 22:10
3
dove Thurs 13/11/08 22:11
always a tad late lol
BillySugger Fri 14/11/08 08:27
3
north star Fri 14/11/08 12:52
minimum of 3 and any odd number above 3
BillySugger Fri 14/11/08 15:39
3 isn't above 3
north star Mon 17/11/08 13:35
Quite correct BS and your point is?
BillySugger Mon 17/11/08 14:30
You said , & I quote 'any odd number above 3' - well 3 isn't above 3 is it ?
waterboatman Mon 17/11/08 14:32
most deffinately 3.
north star Tue 18/11/08 12:09
conveniently ignoring the words I used previous to that quoted
Schutzengel Tue 18/11/08 12:13
Question Author
If it was any odd number above three, then there would be more than 2 ducks, in front of and behind the middle duck.
nightmare Tue 18/11/08 12:44
You never specified that the two ducks had to be in front of / behind the middle duck.
If there are 97 ducks in a line, there are 2 ducks in front of the third duck from the front, two ducks behind the 95th duck and a duck (number 49) in the middle.
Therefore, any odd number greater than 1 answers the question correctly, as stated.
Schutzengel Tue 18/11/08 12:53
Question Author
The question was as stated originally.
2 ducks in front of a duck = 3
That's the starting point.
Next -
So there are only 3 ducks.
Next - 2 ducks behind a duck, gives 2 ducks behind the first duck, of the three.
And there are still only 3 ducks.
Of the 3 ducks that are there, there is one in the middle, so the answer is - 3.