Twitching & Birdwatching1 min ago
Putting the 'mental' into Fundamental?
29 Answers
It seems that the Taliban have some competition. There appears to be another fundamentalist Islamic regime vying for the 'Most Intolerant Society” award. The Taliban are going to have to 'up' their game methinks.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/...world-africa-12138627
http://www.bbc.co.uk/...world-africa-12138627
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by birdie1971. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I wonder how the al-Shabab chaps (and they are all 'chaps') see the future panning out in a society that effectively outlaws casual social contact between the sexes? How on earth are people of the opposite sex meant to meet and form bonds if there are laws in place preventing them from engaging in...
Oh, hang on. I'm trying to understand fundamentalist claptrap by applying logical reasoning. Silly me.
Oh, hang on. I'm trying to understand fundamentalist claptrap by applying logical reasoning. Silly me.
Birdie...the woman will 'have' to marry the man her 'relation' picked.
It's so so sad. The thought of not being able to argue back (debate) to put your point across, to openly say how you feel, to know that the man you love will dismiss (in his head) every moody thing you said while suffering from PMT, to be yourself and not be inferior to your boy child....
Who wants a partner that is NOT allowed to answer back?
It's so so sad. The thought of not being able to argue back (debate) to put your point across, to openly say how you feel, to know that the man you love will dismiss (in his head) every moody thing you said while suffering from PMT, to be yourself and not be inferior to your boy child....
Who wants a partner that is NOT allowed to answer back?
aog, we have statute determining what is and what is not permitted in public at a national level. public displays of attention (pda's) are generally permitted, whilst indecent exposure isn't. sexual offences act 2003.
the matter for the level of acceptability of pda is dependent upon location and social determination. for example, two men holding hands and snogging iin public is perfectly acceptable, but standing in a bus queue and fiddling with your birds fanjita isn't. indecent exposure actualy does not outlaw people to walk around in the nuddy. it is only really when exposure is agressive or for offensive shock (as in the stereotypical old man in a raincoat) that it is.
i'll leave you to consider all the scenarios in your own inner turmoil. ofcourse they might think it and say it, but hopefully this would help explain why such a law is unlikely to be pased by or recognised by some splitter group.
the matter for the level of acceptability of pda is dependent upon location and social determination. for example, two men holding hands and snogging iin public is perfectly acceptable, but standing in a bus queue and fiddling with your birds fanjita isn't. indecent exposure actualy does not outlaw people to walk around in the nuddy. it is only really when exposure is agressive or for offensive shock (as in the stereotypical old man in a raincoat) that it is.
i'll leave you to consider all the scenarios in your own inner turmoil. ofcourse they might think it and say it, but hopefully this would help explain why such a law is unlikely to be pased by or recognised by some splitter group.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.