Age of criminal responsibility?

This was on the news over the weekend so I'm amazed no one has asked the question on here so here goes.

Is 10 fair enough or should it be rasied or lowered. The childrens commissionaer, Maggie Atkinson thinks it should be 12, and that the Bulger killers should not have been prosecuted.

I think it's fine as it is, what do you think ABers?

Should We Change The Age Of Criminal Responsibility?

This poll is closed.

Should the Age of Criminal Responsibility be changed?

A. The age of Criminal Responsibility is fine as it is
38.46% (10 votes)
B. The age of Criminal Responsibility should be raised
34.62% (9 votes)
C. The age of Criminal Responsibility should be lowered
26.92% (7 votes)

See final stats

Stats until: 22:15 Wed 30th Jul 2014 (Refreshed every 5 minutes)
13:02 Mon 15th Mar 2010
 
Best Answer


No best answer has yet been selected by R1Geezer. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

21 to 40 of 50

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

I know Wikipedia can be wrong on things like that but they agree with me on it being Howard.

They also say

"The editors of The Sun newspaper handed a petition bearing nearly 280,000 signatures to Home Secretary Michael Howard, in a bid to increase the time spent by both boys in custody."

Because that's the proper way to determine verdicts isn't it? - have a publicity campaign - nowadays you'd do a phone-in and cash in at the same time!
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
LucyThomas is so right.
As I related on a similar thread last week, two girls were jumping up and down on my car roof.They eventually, reluctantly, got down and one said to the other "don't worry, he can't touch us".they were six years old.
Lucy Thomas - what makes you suggest 8? Why not 9, or 5 -7? What other reasons do you have apart from that there are estates with 'feral' children?

I don't ask these in a combative way, just that as I said, I don't know where to begin and I want an inkling of how other people have such firm ideas about something so subjective.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
///I believe that the age of criminal responsibility was set at 10 in Victorian times (I may be wrong) when children were much more innocent and didn't have the influences that today's children have. ///

In Victorian times, most children would be working to help support the family. This had the effect of passing a law in 1880 ensuring that children had to attend school from 6 to age 10.

Children age 9-11 could work 8 hours a day and 11 - 18 year olds could work a maximum of 12 hours a day. Children under 9 could not work. BUT this only applied to the Textile industry. Coal mines etc could have children from the age of 5 working in them.

Not sure what you think of the Victoria Era, but it certainly wasn't 'innocent'
-- answer removed --
I'm happy to sit on the fence here. Apart from relatives, neighbours and what I see on TV, I don't know enough ten year olds to judge.

Maggie Atkinson knows far more about child psychology than me. And I dare say, experts on the other side of the debate do too.

Happy for them to thrash it out rather than chucking emotive guesswork around.
///We are in a situation where nine year olds laugh at the law because they know the police can't touch them.///

What sort of percentage of 9 year olds? How many in total? Where is your information source?
Hi everyone. I've just tried adding a poll to R1's question - let me know if there are any problems.

All the best,

Spare Ed
-- answer removed --
True Lucy, they didn't.

But I will ask again, what percentage of 9 year olds you think are affected in this way for you to want to lower the age of responsibility.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Lucy - you seem to be talking in soundbites

And not making much sense - I don't think most children in Victorian times were particularly inocent.

Perhaps a few Dickins novels might help
The age of criminal responsibility was not set at 10 in Victorian times. Until 1963 it was 8.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --

21 to 40 of 50

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Related Questions

http://tinyurl.com/37ewhhk Should the age of child criminal responsibility be reduced by 2 years, rather than increased by 2 years?...
This is posted as an aside to the programme on smacking children. I say that if parents are not prepared to smack/ discipline thier children, a significant number of whom are running amok in...
I have recently been embroiled in a family dispute concerning a younger sister age 41 due to fact that she continues to harass, bully, intimidate and live off my father’s income. She lives with...
Shannon Matthews (AGAIN!!!!!!) I apologise if somebody else has said this, but is it beyond the realms of possibility that Shannon herself was involved in her own kidnapping? "Look shazzy, just be a...

Latest posts