To subscribe to this question you need to
sign in to the AnswerBank or register
if you are not already a member. All you need is a valid email address to register.
|
|
To put it bluntly, just because there's the chance of an innocent person dying doesn't mean you should rule something out.
For those of you who think that's a rather brutal thing to say, consider your answer to the following question..
The police carry guns. There are many well documented cases of them shooting dead entirely innocent people. In view of this, how can anyone still believe that we should allow the police to carry guns?
|
|
|
Ludwig
That is nothing like a logical argument. By your method of reaching a concusion, an elephant is grey, a filing cabinet is grey, therefore all elephants are filing cabinets.
You cannot equate a split-second decision of a police officer in a life-or-death situation with a considered carefully argued legal case presented with evidencce, and the deicision of twelve people requiring a concensus.
The police carry guns in special circumstances to protect the lives of innocent people.
The death penalty has always existed as revenge dressed up as deterrent, and this case perfectly indicates why it has no place in a civilised society.
|
|
|
From a purely statistical point of view you could equally ask the question: How many innocents must die before we introduce an effective deterrant?
Cue all the usual do gooders saying capital punishment is not a deterrent. Bollux! It's not 100% deterrent but just delve into the archives and tell me how many murders there where in1960 compared to now.
|
|
|
Is there any statistical proof to suggest that the death penalty actually works?
The news about Barry George should make us react in two ways:
1. Phew - lucky we didn't kill the guy.
2. Who the hell did kill Jill Dando, and why?
|
|
|
"Is there any statistical proof to suggest that the death penalty actually works?"
Good luck with that line of argument, sp1814.
It's raised - quite rightly - every time this debate comes up. And it gets pretty much ignored every time too.
Instead, a bit of factually-rubbish psychology gets lobbed in along the lines of 'Well, it will make them think twice before...."
Even though the facts suggest it doesn't.
|
|
|
Andy,
My argument is completely logical. The questioner is making the point that in this case an innocent person would have died if we'd had the death penalty, and suggesting that's the main reason we shouldn't have it - ie because innocent people could die.
My response was to state that just because an innocent might die is not sufficient reason to rule something out, giving armed police as an example.
You've now introduced a moral element to the argument by saying it is unbecoming of a civilised society, to sit in a court and plan a killing, rather than doing it in the heat of the moment with the intention of protecting others, and that's a different question really.
|
|
|
Alright Ludwig I'll stand up and say that it is unjustifiable that ONE innocent person should die by judicial means just because you seem to imagine that the death penalty is some sort of deterrant when actually it is clearly not.
Take a look at the US where the death penalty exists in some states and tell me hand on heart we should introduce that back into our society.
|
|
|
"Is there any statistical proof to suggest that the death penalty actually works?"
well, not proof but good indicators, I ask again, how many murders where there in 1960? how many in 2007? not hard is it?
It all centres around the semantics of the word "deterrant" nothing is 100% we all accept that. It does not mean that no one will ever be deterred by capital punishment.
|
|
|
obnoxious - where did I say I thought the death penalty was a deterrent.
sp1814 - of the course the death penalty works - people who've been killed never re-offend. It's a fact.
People who are incarcerated for life never re-offend either, and that's the option I prefer by the way.
|
|
|
Alright clearly there were probably more muders this year than in 1960, but what about the differences in population etc. you have to find out what perceentage of the populaiton murdered someone not how many to get a sensible overview.Plus you also need to remember that more murders are detected nowadays than then owing to improved police and forensic proceeedures etc. Anyone got these stats anywhere?
|
|
|
anyway this bloke would not have hanged even if we had capital punishemnt, he would have had appeal after appeal and he would no doubt have got the same result as he did today.
|
|
|
If we were able to look at the murder rate in say, and American state before and after the abolition of capital punishment, it would give us an indicator as to whether the death penalty is an effective detterent.
I'm guessing that if you are really either a) enraged b) psychotic or c) just plain evil, the death penalty wouldn't be much of a deterrent.
Dunno though. I'm certainly no expert.
|
|
|
Me too Tetjam, me too.
The murder of a well liked (in my case lusted after) TV personality + police wanting a quick arrest + local looney.
This combination was always going to add up to a bit of an iffy arrest.
|
|
|
The notion that the death penalty is a deterrent is a farce, Texas has more people on death row than anywhere on earth, so please explain how exactly is the death penalty a deterrent?
|
|
|
Ohh Can I play Crap logic too?
They have a massive murder rate in America and they have capital punishment
Therefore having capital punishment causes a high murder rate.
(Makes as much sense as some of the stuff spouted above)
|
|
|
this group:
http://www.innocenceproject.org/
has worked to examine many cases in the US of people convicted of murder, many on death row awaiting their execution.
In the 16 years since they began their work, they have helped free some of these people by proving that they simply couldn't have done it.
They have saved the lives of not 10 innocents, not 20, not 100, but 218. That's 218 people who could have been put to death for crime they didnt commit - and 218 cases where the real killers were free to potentially kill again.
That's in one country alone, and they only manage to check a handful of the cases that land on their desks.
|
|
|
Question Author
Wow ! Went out & forgot about posting that . Quinlad & sp1814 where is this 'evidence' of which you speak ? R1geezer 'how many murders where there in 1960? how many in 2007? ' ?
There is no evidence that capital punishment is a deterrent , innocent people have been hung before .
"An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind "
|
|
|
Jake - 'Ohh Can I play Crap logic too?'
You never usually ask permission - what's different about this thread? ;-)
|
|
|
Tetjam, thank you for being, if not intelligent, at least not all that clown like
|
|
Personal Loans | Magazine Subscriptions | Mortgage Calculator | Xecuter 3 Mod Chip | Xbox 360 Cheats
