Donate SIGN UP

Would You Pay £18,500 For These Pictures Of Evil?

Avatar Image
youngmafbog | 16:52 Wed 01st Mar 2017 | News
32 Answers
Although interesting to see I really would not want to own them.

Surely a museum is the best place for them to prevent their misuse by some misguided individual?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4270820/Never-seen-shots-Hitler-revealed-photo-album.html
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 32rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Personally would consign them to a bonfire.
I'm surprised they are so cheap, given their provenance.
I wouldn't wish to own them but am prepared to bet they make much more than their auction guide price.

A Museum would be best, History innit?
-- answer removed --
I agree very interesting pictures, perhaps not worth £18.500 perhaps, but still should not be locked away, they are all part of history.

Interesting to note however that Hitler seemed to be adored by the German people, one has to wonder why?

And why do you think that they could be misused by some misguided individual YMB, there are many more pictures around of that Monster, but no evidence of misuse.
hi, my daughter is four, and when she started schooli had a convo with her about her body and how she doesn't have to let people touch her and that some bad people might. I did it because she is going to be coming into contact with brothers and father's of friends and men at school when she is out of my control and view. I think this is the same
wrong thread, sorry!
hic hic
Question Author
The problem with these ones AOG is clearly they are unvetted personal ones bound in a book covered in a Swastika Being special could lead to them being used in some shrine or worse.

I too found the adoration from the German people interesting. In other pictures I had always assumed the crowds were setup for propaganda. These clearly were not.
Maggie has it right here, otherwise any Museum will be a place of pilgrimage for the ultra-Right for years to come.
AOG,and all~
When Germany (as we know) lost WW1,the following occurred.
This is from Wikipedia~
In Article 231 Germany accepted responsibility for the losses and damages caused by the war "as a consequence of the ... aggression of Germany and her allies." The treaty required Germany to compensate the Allied powers, and it also established an Allied "Reparation Commission" to determine the exact amount which Germany would pay and the form that such payment would take. The commission was required to "give to the German Government a just opportunity to be heard", and to submit its conclusions by 1 May 1921. In the interim, the treaty required Germany to pay an equivalent of 20 billion gold marks ($5 billion) in gold, commodities, ships, securities or other forms. The money would help to pay for Allied occupation costs and buy food and raw materials for Germany.
The above was instigated by France,because of her shame (at being occupied)and her hatred for Germany.
Germany after WW1 was destitute,her government had brought Germany to it's knees financially in the war.Add this poverty to France's greed,and you leave the way open for a dictator;which just so happened to be Hitler.He played on the people's fears,and gave them hopes which (in the end) could not be fullfilled.So, most post WW1 Germans saw Hitler as a saviour,what,or who, else could restore Germany to it's rightful place in the world.When you are poverty stricken you turn to anyone for help, even if you have doubts.
Many thanks
Unfortunately this never materialised~ "money would help to pay for food and raw materials for Germany."
private photos and films of Hitler have been round for years.



They don't seem to have led the world into the abyss.
Sex education for the win!
-- answer removed --
maggiebee 'Personally would consign them to a bonfire.'

mikey4444 'Maggie has it right here,'

Are you both being ironic?

Maggiebee and Mikey, why do you want to destroy History, just because you don't agree with it (nor do I by the way), it happened, it's a fact and should be preserved as such as a warning to others.
Although I do suspect one of you is too bigoted to understand that.

1 to 20 of 32rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Would You Pay £18,500 For These Pictures Of Evil?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.