Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 17 of 17rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by trt. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Why the North West ?
So far 90% say no!
Big difference between "would" and "will", of course. And even between "would" and "can". If I actually owned the house I lived in, and it had some spare beds/ room, then I might consider the question more seriously. As it is, in a rented flat that already has as many people as it can reasonably be expected to take it hardly matters whether I would want to take in a refugee or not as I am in no position to.

Anyway, even if only 10% of people in the North West would take a migrant/ refugee into their homes, that could still amount to welcome rooms for maybe somewhere in the region of 50,000-100,000 migrants housed in the North-West alone (probably a too optimistic figure but it's in the ballpark for potential space, at least).
Question Author
## Why the North West ? ##

I thought that as well chap, then realized Southerners are to posh to be asked?
"Big difference between "would" and "will""

hahaha...typical.....whatever the words used, its pretty clear the vast majority in this country dont want them even here, let alone in their homes....would, will...pffft
Well I'm in the North West and I wouldn't !
I'm slightly surprised by baz's scoffing, in a way, because I would have thought this is precisely the sort point he would have been making recently, ie "I'd like to see you take an immigrant into your home" = "there's no point preaching about how we've got to take in migrants unless you are prepared to yourself".

So, here we see a survey saying that not that many people actually want to take migrants in in the first place, to which I added that, in effect, quite a few of those who said they would take in migrants probably won't. So far, so pretty much uncontroversial I'd have thought. Ah, well.
yes

. . . NO WAY!!!!
Definitely not
It's a no no from me.
No way as it would be a physical impossibility with all my mater's rubbish

Then there are the swine....
I managed to vote 'No' a few minutes before the poll closed. It then stood at 92.?% saying 'No'.
Make that 91% that say No. I don't think they will be leaving again any time soon. Are they just giving their country away instead of fighting for it and rebuilding it? A great many of the refugees are fit young men.

How stupid would it be for an elderly single woman to accept a stranger of any nationality or creed into her home?
Yes, of course...x
askyourgran has a very good point. All these young men should be fighting for their country, not running away . Perhaps their accommodation should be in barracks? If every male between 18 and 30 were conscripted and given basic training they could then be a fairly formidable force against ISIL. After all, our males did it.

1 to 17 of 17rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Itv Poll, Would You House Refugees?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.