Celebrity Boobs And Party Poopers

[joggerjayne]

The Daily Mail seems determined to spoil everbody's fun ...

(see Lacrosse team initiation thread).

Except the fun, it seems, of it's dirty pervert readers.

Thousands of miles away, in Los Angeles, Rihanna goes out for the evening in a skimpy top, and no bra.

Surely no raggy tabloid would try to pass that off as a "News" item, just so that they could publich a photo (sorry, THREE photos (!)) of Rihanna's boobs?

Oh yes they would !!!

Step up to the plate The Daily Pervert (surely "Mail"? Ed)

Presumably the male readers who pop off to the loo for ten minutes with the pictures of Rihanna's boobs are the same ones who are up in arms when the Lacrosse team dress up in nappies.

Aaaah, hang on ... it's all becoming clear ... Daily Mail readers are annoyed because they would have preferred the Lacrosse team to NOT wear the nappies!!! ... then the pervy Mail would have published even MORE photos!

[joggerjayne]

So the "Femail" section is what? ... just what the name suggests ???

[mrs_overall]

"stop cluttering up the news section with this silliness"

Why do the words pot, kettle and black spring to mind?

[maggiebee]

Reminder to self on post-it note - never buy the Daily Mail! Don't think I could stand the excitement.

[joggerjayne]

Now, now ... no more digs if you please.

Actually, I rather enjoy AOG's posts. You get to catch up on all the things in the News that might come up at dinner parties.

Actually, at the dinner parties I go to, no one ever talks about the News, just who's bonking whom, and willies, and things like that ... but you know what I mean.

[joggerjayne]

maggie: reminder to (your)self ... never buy the Daily Mail. Full Stop!

[FredPuli43]

I don't know what masturbatory thoughts you think men and boys have, Jayne, but I'm prepared to guess that a sight of Rihanna's nipples through a dress is not high on the list, if it is anywhere on it, and no loo visits will ensue.

Why are you so indignant about this? Because the pictures are not worthy of a newspaper of such high standing, a paper of record? Because there is some supposed hypocrisy, though the paper didn't condemn while simultaneously printing three pictures ? Do you get upset by page 3 of the Sun? (I do, but that's because I have begun to suspect that, say, Mary Anne, 23, from Birmingham, is not such an expert on Proust as her News in Briefs caption suggests)

[joeluke]

This might have been interesting if Rihanna actually had any boobs