Politics

Feeling the pain - the people and their MPs

Here we have a strange contrast.
On the one hand the Bank of England and Alistair Darling telling us that pay will not keep pace with inflation and we should just tighten our belts and get on with it.
Then there is a recommendation that MPs take a rise of £40,000+ a year but be prepared to give up their claims for expenses relating to second homes. The £40,000+ represents the maximum permitted claim for such alleged outgoings. A very nice pay rise for those who do not, or cannot claim that maximum. Opinions?

fenultimate Sun 22/06/08 10:41

<< Previous

Next >>

Subscribe to question

Post an Answer

Theland
Sun 22/06/08
10:44

If you're in charge of doling out the soup, you're going to make sure that your bowl is the one with the meat in it.

That's where we need more checks and balances.

fenultimate
Sun 22/06/08
11:54

Question Author

I agree, but checks and balances are what we do not have. Who will vote on this report? Whose vote will have any weight?

dancunian
Thurs 26/06/08
18:24

Cynicism aside, genuinely independent reviews into MP pay always conclude that MPs are underpaid.

Expenses have always been used to cover all the other bases as a result.

The reality is of course, most MPs traditionally shy away from voting their own pay rise because of the political backlash.

MP pay is an easy target. Perhaps it should be linked to other high-profile public sector workers:

The Cheif exec of my local Council (unelected) takes home £100k.

My MP (elected) takes home £63k.

So make of that what you will I suppose.

Post an Answer

Submit the above question and answers

add to del.icio.us	add to digg	add to furl
add to reddit	add to Technorati	add to Blinklist
add to StumbleUpon	add to squidoo	add to ma.gnolia
add to Cocomment	add to Netscape	add to Fark

Most Recent

Most Recently Answered

All Unanswered

All Answered