Donate SIGN UP

Should They Be Spending Their Money On More Important Things?

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 08:26 Thu 01st Oct 2015 | News
11 Answers
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/sherlock-and-luther-lead-british-tv-invasion-of-sub-saharan-africa-a6673881.html

While the British TV audiences are shown harrowing sights of Africa's children drinking dirty water, the cause of many premature deaths, Sub-Saharan Africa is becoming one of the fastest growing buyers of UK-produced television programmes.

Gravatar

Answers

1 to 11 of 11rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Geography not your strong point, AOG?
Of course they should. But while there are still "bleeding hearts" and so-called celebrities wanting to look like saints in the civilised world, there is no need!
Are the countries buying these shows also the ones struggling with drought?
Geography isn't my strong point, TheChair, but Somalia has a growing movie industry, and we have certainly thrown plenty of money in their direction!
same the world over - you either have everything or nothing. India, South Africa etc etc.
they should spend their money on what they want.

South Africa, who this story is primarily about, has a higher GDP than Ireland, Denmark, Finland, but you wouldn't post that they should not buy television programmes.
AOG

When you say "they", which countries are you referring to?

I ask, because only South Africa is listed specifically, and as Gromit says, the country has a fairly decent GDP.

But a general point is this - there are few countries that don't have serious poverty issues.

Brazil for instance has massive poverty, but it also has a large population who earn enough to buy consumer goods.

Even in the UK - we have people sleeping rough and we have an ever expanding number of food banks.

Should we too stop buying iPhones and watching Antiques Roadshow until absolutely everyone is off the streets?
Question Author
To those questioning my geography learnings.

It refers to sub-Saharan Africa, which consists of very many countries on the continent of Africa, south of the Sahara, South Africa being at the southern most part.

/// Research from the Producers Alliance for Cinema and Television (Pact) showed that exports to South Africa and the rest of sub-Saharan Africa grew by over a third (35%) in the past year. ///

Question Author
sp1814

I am not aware that the UK, has received billions upon billions of pounds sent to them by other countries and various charities over the decades.
AOG

Unless you know which countries in sub-Saharan Africa this article refers to, your question can only hang in mid air.

If the report referred to all countries in the region, then you might have a point - as it is, there's no way of telling whether any of the countries this report refers to are claimants of aid.
ex-Commonwealth Countries will get monies by the very fact of their association to the Empire. But I am not sure how many of those are sub-Saharan, and the subject of this report, if any. A bit of a dud question.

1 to 11 of 11rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Should They Be Spending Their Money On More Important Things?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions