The Jackson children

[lynbrown]

Has the DNA of these kids ever been checked against Michael's DNA? I dont for a minute believe they are his biological offspring. Look how dark skinned all the Jackson family are - the kids have no African features at all.

[BertiWooster]

So what if they are or not his biological offspring - What is the problem you , have concerning them ?

[lynbrown]

If they are not truly Jackson offspring, should not their mother now look after them?

[Legolassie]

Their mother wouldn't stand a chance of getting them anyway. Surprises me why they have let MJ's mother have them considering the harshness of his upbringing. I don't care either way but good luck to the kids.

[chazza]

You mean the mother who sold them?
I don't think she should have them

[black bunny]

even if those poor kids don't have MJ's DNA, he was still their father in every sense of the word. MJ's mother will be closer to them than their biological mother, who I understand gave up all her rights to them in return for a lot of money, they don't know who she is.
So in my opinion MJ's mum should get custody.

[4getmenot]

and blanket was from a surrogate rumoured to have been artificially inceminated by a donar so would you want blanket to go there. They should all stay together and be looked after by people they know

[MsEVP]

Confirmed on the news this am that Michael was NOT their biological father.

[tamborine]

None of the claimed parents are biological connected. They were surrogate mothers. MJs children are said to be test tube babes.

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/ourpaper/view/2009- 06-28