Question & Answers
Articles
1 min ago
in ChatterBank
Search In The AnswerBank
The Jackson children
Has the DNA of these kids ever been checked against Michael's DNA? I dont for a minute believe they are his biological offspring. Look how dark skinned all the Jackson family are - the kids have no African features at all.
 |
(Tue 10:16 30/Jun/09) So what if they are or not his biological offspring - What is the problem you , have concerning them ? | |
|
|
(Tue 10:43 30/Jun/09)
Question Author
If they are not truly Jackson offspring, should not their mother now look after them?
|
|
|
|
(Tue 12:54 30/Jun/09) Their mother wouldn't stand a chance of getting them anyway. Surprises me why they have let MJ's mother have them considering the harshness of his upbringing. I don't care either way but good luck to the kids. | |
|
|
(Tue 16:43 30/Jun/09)
You mean the mother who sold them? I don't think she should have them |
|
|
|
(Tue 20:34 30/Jun/09)
even if those poor kids don't have MJ's DNA, he was still their father in every sense of the word. MJ's mother will be closer to them than their biological mother, who I understand gave up all her rights to them in return for a lot of money, they don't know who she is. So in my opinion MJ's mum should get custody. |
|
|
|
(Tue 22:55 30/Jun/09) and blanket was from a surrogate rumoured to have been artificially inceminated by a donar so would you want blanket to go there. They should all stay together and be looked after by people they know | |
|
|
(Wed 07:24 01/Jul/09) Confirmed on the news this am that Michael was NOT their biological father. | |
|
|
(Wed 07:36 01/Jul/09)
None of the claimed parents are biological connected. They were surrogate mothers. MJs children are said to be test tube babes. http://www.dailystar.co.uk/ourpaper/view/2009- 06-28 |
Search In The AnswerBank