Donate SIGN UP

Tennis

Avatar Image
grannie39 | 07:58 Sat 04th Jul 2015 | Film, Media & TV
25 Answers
Is there really any need to have day long coverage on both BBC channels? tennis is as boring as golf. !
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 25rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by grannie39. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
And just what riveting programmes is the tennis replacing, grannie? It's just 2 weeks out of every 52, surely you can find something else to occupy your time for such a short period.
It's only two weeks a year.
Tennis boring? Didn't you see Dustin Brown against Nadal on Thursday, or our own wonderful Heather Watson against Serena Williams yesterday?
(I agree that golf is boring
Totally agree, its like watching paint dry!
We have to put up with 5 consecutive nights (or is it 7?) of the dire X Factor and BGT every year. Now that IS boring. For some weird reason, my house is never as clean and tidy as when those programmes are being aired.
I agree with Cloverjo...we have what adds up to weeks/months of football/rugby/snooker(now that's really boring)!!
I enjoy, tennis, indeed all sports, but why two simultaneous BBC TV channels of sport ( tennis)?
so old pervs like you Sqad can check out that the girls are wearing correct undies ! lol xx
^^^^LOL.....aaaah! ...that's all right then.
Let's face it, Wimbledon is just about the only sporting event the Beeb have left. They are bound to give it maximum exposure and with so many games taking place simultaneously, why not use both channels. As i asked earlier, what riveting programmes is this two week tournament replacing? As a rule, i do not switch my tv on until about 6pm, but if there's live sport to be watched........................... Makes me feel i'm sort of getting a bit of value for my licence fee:-)
Ken.........tennis is for everybody and one channel should be enough...surely.
Others would say that they prefer Eggheads or something that you would consider boring, but they would deem "riveting."
"NOT for everybody" ^^^^
Same here, Ken. I never watch daytime TV unless sport is on, and Wimbledon is my absolute favourite. Let's face it, grannie, there really is a load of rubbish on at other times. (I know because my OH records some of it to watch later.)
Come on, Sqad, nobody, and i mean NOBODY, could ever describe Eggheads as "riveting".
;-)^^^^
Wimbledon has some of the highest viewing figures of any event anywhere in the world and the BBC has the rights to it. They are going to make the most of it. I agree it is boring but that is a minority view. I know several people who take 2 weeks off work just so they can watch uninterrupted tennis on TV.
There are other channels you can watch.
Seems strange that this thread has attracted 17 replies so far, yet gollob's earlier thread, Wimbledon2Day has not received any.

Could it be because gollob chose to put "Get rid of the horsey Clare Balding" and we all know that lady is not up for criticism don't we.
Gollob's post didn't contain a question though -personally I don't turn the TV on in the daytime so it doesn't bother me.
anotheoldgit; as mamy says, gollob did not pose a question, merely made a statement - and possibly a request:-) And, to be totally honest, i have yet to see the 'horsey Claire Balding', despite having watched every day, so far. Perhaps that's because i am not interested in the build up - nor the post mortems - and only take notice when the actual match is being played.
//Is there really any need to have day long coverage on both BBC channels?//

since the bbc has the ability to stream 24 red button channels to freeview tv, that's a fair question and probably one for which the answer is "no, there is no need".

1 to 20 of 25rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Tennis

Answer Question >>