Criminal

to ethandron, they were in uniform. he resisted as he was trying to show them his license and insurance details, as he is often harassed for the same reason. but they did not allow him to get them, instead, they were attacking him. we took pictures of his injuries and the hospital said his muscles were definately pulled.

sorry i didnt make myself clear, he was charged with common assault and assault on the police officers. there were'nt any witnesses, i guess it will be just his word against the two of them.

would it help that, their reason for stopping and holding him down were thrown out. or, is it now a seperate case of his alleged attacks?

what do you mean by that noknowledge?

Im unsure if you have a opinion on the case before understanding what i am trying to say. he has been stopped on a number of occasions and is always asked for insurance and license, SO HE KEEPS IT IN THE CAR. so in this case he assumed it was for the same thing and tried to resist and explain that he has his details in the car.

as for the previous person, i really dont appreciate your comments, maybe you dont get harassed like some people and dont like to wish things onto people, but i hope that one day you get to experience how injust the police can behave!!

Now do you believe that police make unforgivable mistakes?! And can be malicious, spiteful and unneccessarily VIOLENT??
You can check youtube for several videos of met police (UK) doing worse. ( I only put this up, cos it's sky news, so no-one else can accuse me of being a liar/exaggerating. Also randyraven, i did not ask for your opinion on police, i explained my partners case to get a professional opinion on the outcome of such a case. Also our lawyers are in the process of obtaining cctv footage.

beck07 - thank you I hope it does too.

YouTube video link: sky news covering the case of police officers unlawful behaviour

he had stopped trying to get to the documents when they began running to the car and dragged him out immediately. from my research on stopping people for whatever reason, it is not carried out in that manner. He wasn't speeding or driving reckless. so there really isn't an initial reason for asking him to pull over let alone drag him out the car. as far as im concerned i thought police had a system which could check licence plates to see if the car is insured or not - which it is. so what were their reasons for this aasualt on my partner, he is in every right to resist as they did not explain their reasons for stopping him, as if they did he would of produced his full uk driving license and insurance certificate.

to nic121, i totally understand what your saying, he shouldn't of resisted. the police seem to be getting away with things like this too often. they treat innocent people any way they like and when their trying to get a point across they arrest them and charge for assault its unfair. the point i made at the beginning still hasn't been addressed. everyone is trying to say he must of done something wrong firstly - when really he hadn't.

and to ethandron he is not known to the police not for drugs or anything. he is a hardworking man and father, so i would appreciate any assumptions to be dropped now, because it seems as though most people are making them and i have actually had enough of trying to find out a simple answer of custody or not, it just seems to be upsetting me more than anything. i have noticed that people have been prosecuting my partner, but no one is talking about the system police have to check for insured cars and why that was not used. police are not completely innocent, they are human just like the rest of us. the same way you have made up your minds that my partner must be a criminal, you could have said that the police are not using facilities available to them and are stopping people for no reason. i didnt know that the answers will be so stereotypical and one sided on this answer bank.

in saying that thank you to the realistic people, who have an open mind who should be answering questions on this site.

i am not on this site to make you believe me that was never my intention. i explained the story exactly how it is and frankly i cant be bothered to defend my partner against your stupid alegations. at the end of the day your not going to decide what happens to him so i really don't care anymore about what you think.

if you lived in my area it is not uncommon for idol police to wait to start trouble over nothing. so you will never understand and to be honest you don't seem to be living in the real world because police are not perfect. i have spoken to a friend of mine who is a police officer, and she even said that some treat people like that because they know they can and that they wont complain. also about the database, if they know that it is prone not to be updated (although he has been insured since last year) they should not treat as if he has commited an offence and could of simply asked for proof of insurance and license to drive - which he could of provided.

to be honest with you, i would really prefer that you don't reply because you are really stressing me out with your ignorance!

Thank you to the few people who understood my problem with the police.

To everyone else who thought my partner was a to blame for their attack on him, i would just like update you. medical reports taken by the doctor after the attack, showed that the police had no form of injury not even a scratch. however my partner had a whole list of injuries (which will be claimed for). the case was thrown out and was a total waste of time and energy. this highlights your ignorance, and i strongly advice that you wake up and notice what happens around you.