| Best Answer
|
|
well in Quarter Session Order Books there are references to the crime of 'Lewdness' leading to the birth of a bastard child who was a burden on the parish.
|
|
so it was abit more than 'showing a finely-turned ankle' but less than prostitution
|
|
Question Author
But was that the only cause for a woman to be imprisoned for lewdness?
And - is it that they didn't know / were somehow prevented from naming the father - enough men were had up for fathering bastards at the time, so there was clearly a means of naming and shaming.... So what I'm trying to fathom is whether women's behaviour other than having babies was 'policed' - was cheerful promiscuity likely to get you in jail? Or swearing loudly? Or dressing like a tart? |
|
I browsed through the pub blacklists in birmingham and I was quite surprised to see how common prostitution was!
http://www.birmingham...louts-97319-26121071/ |
|
sorry mosaic, that was slightly off topic
|
|
Lewdness or Lewd women or Lewd behavior as recorded in the Quarter Session orders does seem to be linked to the activities of houses of disprepute and ladies of the night. Bawdy houses etc.
|
|
the women were incarcerated or removed from the Parish, especially if they did not have settlement rights and were convicted of that type of offence. they would be removed to their home parish, where they would probably be examined by the parish constable as to their means and possibly locked up as a vagrant, harsh life
|
|
Question Author
Cazz - fascinating insights and a really good online resource from Birmingham. Both of you seem to be indicating that 'lewdness' is something a woman from the rough end of society was accused of......I've not come across any posh tarts or madams coming before the bench (if you'll pardon....)
So, one of the discoveries I made between yesterday eveninig and this mornng is that lewdness was a more ancient law, but that it seems to be taken by the 19th century as the slightly more defined misdemeanor of 'outraging public decency' - lewdness for shorthand. Part of this included a need for the act to have been witnessed by two or more people, who were offended by it. So whatever these ladies were doing, it seems to have been in 'public' - I suppose anywhere outdoors - as opposed to behind closed doors. I think there's still a lot to unpick here - thanks for your insights! |
| I have a convictiion on my enhanced disclosure dating from March 1962, I was born in October 1947 so I was 14 years 5 months old. I spoke to a woman at the council and she says she cannot understand... |
| I have a convictiion on my enhanced disclosure dating from March 1962, I was born in October 1947 so I was 14 years 5 months old. I spoke to a woman at the council and she says she cannot understand... |
Is It Wrong To Use The Bible As A...
0 min ago
Society & Culture
Chatteris Quiz "at The Church"
0 min ago
Quizzes & Puzzles
0 min ago
Health & Fitness
Hotel Room & Tea Making Facilities
0 min ago
Travel
Where Is Your 'war On Terror' Now...
1 min ago
News
3 mins ago
News