Donate SIGN UP

The Damage Is Done If You Ask Me

Avatar Image
youngmafbog | 13:58 Fri 07th Nov 2014 | News
10 Answers
http://news.sky.com/story/1368531/labour-pair-deny-secret-pact-over-miliband

The one thing that surprise me is that they dont seem to have a sucession plan. What if Ed went to meet his maker, surely they would not hang around waiting for someone else to step up?

All the papers seem to be carrying this one even the lefty rags so surely Ed has now been compromised no matter what his shadow cabinet do?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 10 of 10rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Yes, damage already done. To have questions raised about leadership this close to a general election is pretty much the death knell.
The only Labour MP(Alan Johnson) who could possibly carry them to any semblence of shared power is too old IMHO.
Question Author
yep, looks like Bacon Butty Ed has had his chips!
Question Author
Latest YouGov / The Sun results 6th November - Con 32%, Lab 33%, LD 8%, UKIP 15%; APP -26

1 point in it yesterday, wonder what it is today ?
Labour just don't really look fit to govern at the moment.
Absolutely 'damage done'. Who would vote for a party in such disarray?
if the Times story is complete rubbish, then I don't see why Miliband would let it force him to stand down. Would you?
Question Author
Because jno it is not just the story is it. Whilst I appreciate you need to try and deflect from the failings of your beloved labour party, please try and take the rose tinted off for a moment and see it for what it is.

The story would probably go away if it wasn't for all the other things:

There is dissent and criticism of the Labour leader inside the Parliamentary Labour Party, lots of it. And it isn't just coming from a few fed up Blairites who backed Ed's brother in 2010 and have never accepted his leadership.

And there's plenty to criticise. He dithers in decision making, MPs complain, and surrounds himself with Yes men (there are very few women) in his office and cronies in his inner circle.

His party conference speech was a disaster, leaving out the passages on deficit and immigration, and he bombed in the Scottish referendum campaign. It's claimed his confidence is "shot" since the conference disaster.

Then there have been the dodgy photo-ops and TV images. First was the disastrous bacon butty debacle, then the feminist T-shirt allegedly - although that was disputed - made in a sweatshop and then handing money to a beggar, an attempted kind gesture that backfired.
first rule of politics, never believe anything until it's been officially denied! Millipede is bad enough but gawd help us with these two, it'll be Brown and Blair all over again with even less talent! Thankfully there is very little chance of Labour being in any sort of power for 5½ years.
// they dont seem to have a sucession plan. //

Miliband isn't very good and I will not pretend he is, but he will be Labour leader at the next General Election. These stories are without foundation.

Parties support their leaders even if they are useless (IDS being the recent exception). Hague and Howard were clearly useless but the Party stuck with them until they lost an election.

Opposition Parties rarely have a Succession Plan because they generally are led by new leaders because the old leaders lost a General Election. They have to lose an election before they are changed again. Other than IDS, I cannot think of a leader removed before an election.

Not sure the Conservatives were following a succession plan when John Major replaced Margaret Thatcher. He wasn't the obvious choice. Cameron definitely was not the choice of the Parliamentary Conservatives MPs, he was elected by the constituency members.

All of that is not to say I would not like Miliband to go, I would. The very latest they could have changed leader was at last month's Conference. It is too late now.
// Hague and Howard were clearly useless but the Party stuck with them until they lost an election. //

No-one resigns just before an election. That's pathetic. even if it become clear they've got no chance of winning, they have to go through the motions, and lose - that's when they resign and move on.

I see Miliband as the William Hague of the Labour party. He 'll probably go and and have a great career in some other role, but he got the job of party leader too soon.

1 to 10 of 10rss feed

Do you know the answer?

The Damage Is Done If You Ask Me

Answer Question >>