ChatterBank0 min ago
No best answer has yet been selected by KAZ. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Ah, but the white candy causes obesity and tooth decay. Try very wet cigarettes, they create very little smoke.
Seriously, low tar, low nicotine cigarettes typically mean the smoker draws harder to get the necessary chemicals the body expects. Coupled with the problem that ultra low cigatettes have holes in the filter that are easy to cover, 'healthy' is a complete misnomer
why bother smokin
why does the gov put warning sign on the packet and still leaves it on shelf to be sold . they like to make money and people who smok like to dye for it.
whose braineir the gov or the dying one think! before you smok
there is no such healthy cigarettes so get over it .
no matter how low the nicotene tar is once the dammage is done it cannot be replaceable . just give up !
Let me rephrase the question... Of course there is no Healthy cigarette, but I wanted to know which brand on the current market has the lowest tar/nicotene content? Like with beer, some have a higher alcohol content than others, surely there are the same differences with cigarettes? there are many brands that state "mild" or even "extra mild" on the box but does this neccessarily mean they are better to smoke than regular? also I heard that Menthol cigarettes worse than regular is this true?
Kaz, the problem with looking at the company data on the box is that the test machines use to determine the chemical content suck out the smoke by holding the very end of the filter. It differs from real life in two ways, firstly the holes in the filter that figers normally block remain open. Secondly, research has shown that smokers of low tar cigarettes typically draw harder to maximise the chemical intake.
The EU is in the process of banning the use of terms like Light and Mild as they are deemed to be misleading.
Some of the brands offer ultra low or ultra mild varieties, but at that level minor differences in content make little or no practical difference.
all cigarettes have nicotene and tar. we can reduce this nicotene and tar content from cigarettes means to make a healthy cigarette , we have made a alternative in the lab by experimenting on albino mice.we made a cigarette filter which filters nicotene and tar from the cigarettes to a extent and made cigarette healthier.
to know more abt this, catch me at email@example.com
http://www.stopsmokinghabits.com Media URL: http://www.stopsmokinghabits.com
When you have a look most other brands, they contain, on average, 10mg of carbon monoxide and tar and 0.9/0.8mg of nicotine.
When you look at it according to these three factors ONLY, 10 silk cut silver is the equivalent to 1 chesterfield or superking (or whichever other brand you'd like to compare it to).
The only downside to this is that IF you're already addicted to nicotine you may end up having more just to get the same effect and satisfy your nicotine craving. Silk Cut are also one of the more expensive choices :/
Working on the kiosk, I see people come to me every day and I see first hand what Cigarettes are doing to their health. DON'T SMOKE!
Hope this helped :)
For the Tobaccoholic, there is no safe level of tar or nicotine because he will smoke whatever is available at the time. And quitting smoking does not cure his predilection to excess or "addictive personality".
He will simply switch to another form of excess whether it be alcohol, drugs, sugar or high-fat foods. Often with far greater implications to his health and/or the well-being of others around him.
The difference with the social smoker is they can take it or leave it.
It's exactly the same with alcohol drinkers. There are social drinkers and alcoholics, those who take it to excess.